@ambrona said in #29:
> . You show your thinking process with or without an order.
Well, some of that could be that I might be writing many irons in some post as they pop up and would not fit with currently typed sentence, and each of them might end up rephrasing some of each other (because I do have some average points I want to share, in spite of apparent divergence), and then I get the genius idea of editing above and or below those different paragraphs. Which is kind of an argument for my journaling-no-looking-back, so only my internal chaos shows, not the added convoluted contritions. (this last 2 lines are me doing that, the editing).
But yes my thinking as expressed here in ASCII, a poor approximation of things from my visual thinking, grinding that in order, is an unreachable muse. I opted for iterations, and redundancy within, hoping some converging spiral would emerge.. but I also butcher upon second guessing that I might not have been readable.. So a mess. so kudos for not flinching. Or being resilient about that (other postedit, sometimes it does not derail).
Generally allergic to deep sequential procedures.. I wish we could write in parallel.. like we can think visually.
Also looking forward your other presentations.
> . You show your thinking process with or without an order.
Well, some of that could be that I might be writing many irons in some post as they pop up and would not fit with currently typed sentence, and each of them might end up rephrasing some of each other (because I do have some average points I want to share, in spite of apparent divergence), and then I get the genius idea of editing above and or below those different paragraphs. Which is kind of an argument for my journaling-no-looking-back, so only my internal chaos shows, not the added convoluted contritions. (this last 2 lines are me doing that, the editing).
But yes my thinking as expressed here in ASCII, a poor approximation of things from my visual thinking, grinding that in order, is an unreachable muse. I opted for iterations, and redundancy within, hoping some converging spiral would emerge.. but I also butcher upon second guessing that I might not have been readable.. So a mess. so kudos for not flinching. Or being resilient about that (other postedit, sometimes it does not derail).
Generally allergic to deep sequential procedures.. I wish we could write in parallel.. like we can think visually.
Also looking forward your other presentations.