Don't always trust LiChess computer analysis.

See this corresspondence game:


I submitted the game for LiChess computer analysis - It told me that
45. f5 was a mistake
I disagreed with the engine and let my local Stockfish sit for a few hours on the position (depth 45).

It came back with f5 being the best move +0.9 after all and Rc7 being 3rd best at +0.2 - a 70 centipawn difference, so I would call this an engine blunder.

The moral to the story is don't always take LiChess computer analysis for granted - think for yourself.

Cheers,
Andy

you mean don't take it for granite :)

It is evident Stockfish analysis is not always right, otherwise Stockfish would never lose a game and it does lose games in the TCEC engine championship.

Until chess is solved everything will be prone to making mistakes.

That's why we're counting on you, YGNR.