I'm having fun doing and studing training chalenges, they are so great to learn and improve our chess vision.
However, sometimes I'm missing more tolerance at the moment to find the demanded continuation;
to improve my way of chess, what I'm doing is to make a fast view and try to find as fast as posible the solution, or at least, one of the best/great movement. I agree than sometimes its not the better movement, but I think than it should have to allow more tolerance and don't losing as many points if you were wrong when actually you were not as much.
Sometimes, actually, the system is already working and its giving you another option to re-try: "Good movement, but you can do it better" (or something like that, I have it in spanish)
So, I propose than you add this option to avoid losing the chalenge, and also your points.
Some examples I have where I was sad than they count me it bad, took my points, and don't allow me to success the chalenge:
Correct movement: (check mate in 2)
Incorrect movement: (winning for free the Queen in 2)
I agree than the check mate is better, but in the situation we were, we had both same pieces, and the end was my queen, bishop and rock against one Rock and Bishop, I would allow the "mistake" and confusion of thinking than capturing the Queen is the better movement. And at least, the program say you: "Good movement, but not the best one"
I also remember another one which the correct movements were checkmate in 7; when I was at correct movent 3; I decided to do another line (which was considered wrong, made me lose points, and it didn't allow me to win the points I deserved) My other line was: winning a Rock, forcing the contrary to sacrifice Bishop, Knight, and the other Rock, and eventually, it was checkmate in 11. (The truth is than I didnt see the checkmate in 11, but I saw than I could win many material so I was clearly going for that line)
I agree than the computer and the training wants me to find the best combination, but in that case, my combination was great enought and it didnt even say: "good but not the best" it simply take away my points.
What you think?
(as I'm recording videos during playing) I could create the last game I talked about:
That was the correct continuation:
http://en.lichess.org/1e97LBaW/black
That was my line which make me loss the points:
http://en.lichess.org/60eqtzJG/black
Thanks for your attention.
However, sometimes I'm missing more tolerance at the moment to find the demanded continuation;
to improve my way of chess, what I'm doing is to make a fast view and try to find as fast as posible the solution, or at least, one of the best/great movement. I agree than sometimes its not the better movement, but I think than it should have to allow more tolerance and don't losing as many points if you were wrong when actually you were not as much.
Sometimes, actually, the system is already working and its giving you another option to re-try: "Good movement, but you can do it better" (or something like that, I have it in spanish)
So, I propose than you add this option to avoid losing the chalenge, and also your points.
Some examples I have where I was sad than they count me it bad, took my points, and don't allow me to success the chalenge:
Correct movement: (check mate in 2)
Incorrect movement: (winning for free the Queen in 2)
I agree than the check mate is better, but in the situation we were, we had both same pieces, and the end was my queen, bishop and rock against one Rock and Bishop, I would allow the "mistake" and confusion of thinking than capturing the Queen is the better movement. And at least, the program say you: "Good movement, but not the best one"
I also remember another one which the correct movements were checkmate in 7; when I was at correct movent 3; I decided to do another line (which was considered wrong, made me lose points, and it didn't allow me to win the points I deserved) My other line was: winning a Rock, forcing the contrary to sacrifice Bishop, Knight, and the other Rock, and eventually, it was checkmate in 11. (The truth is than I didnt see the checkmate in 11, but I saw than I could win many material so I was clearly going for that line)
I agree than the computer and the training wants me to find the best combination, but in that case, my combination was great enought and it didnt even say: "good but not the best" it simply take away my points.
What you think?
(as I'm recording videos during playing) I could create the last game I talked about:
That was the correct continuation:
http://en.lichess.org/1e97LBaW/black
That was my line which make me loss the points:
http://en.lichess.org/60eqtzJG/black
Thanks for your attention.